What if you give services to your overseas group company for free, but still have to pay GST in India? This sounds surprising, but it can happen.
This exact issue was examined by the Delhi High Court in the case of DHL Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India. The decision is very important for multinational companies, captive service units, and logistics businesses.

What if you give services to your overseas group company for free, but still have to pay GST in India? This sounds surprising, but it can happen.
This exact issue was examined by the Delhi High Court in the case of DHL Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India. The decision is very important for multinational companies, captive service units, and logistics businesses.
DHL Express (India) Pvt. Ltd. is part of a global courier and logistics network.
Under a network agreement with its related German company, DHL India handled courier and delivery services in India, while the German entity did similar work abroad.
Importantly, these services were provided free of charge. They were meant as reciprocal operational support within the DHL network, not as regular billed services.
At first, DHL India considered these services taxable and paid GST. Later, it argued that the services should be treated as an export of services, because:
Based on this, DHL applied for zero-rated GST treatment and a refund of GST already paid.
The main issue was this:
Does not receiving payment or foreign exchange make such services non-taxable, or does it only stop them from being treated as exports?
The Court looked at the legal definition of “export of services,” which, under GST, requires five conditions to be met simultaneously.
Since the fourth condition was not met (i.e., no foreign exchange), the services did not qualify as “exports” under GST.
The Court made an important distinction between taxability and export benefits. It ruled that not receiving foreign exchange does not remove the transaction from GST, but only stops it from being treated as an export. This means that GST is still due, even if the services are provided without charging.
GST under Section 7(1)(a) applies to all services that qualify as a “supply” under the law, even if no consideration (payment) is received.
The Court stated that services between related entities, without payment, remain taxable supplies. The fact that the services were rendered free of charge does not change this.
The export benefits, such as zero-rating under the IGST Act, are not automatic but depend on meeting all the conditions for export. Because DHL didn’t meet the condition regarding foreign exchange receipt, they couldn’t qualify for zero-rating or a refund of the GST paid. Therefore, tax was payable, but export benefits were not granted. Businesses whose zero-rating claims are rejected may need support in evaluating refund eligibility and documentation.
The ruling also clarifies several practical aspects relevant to valuation and currency treatment:
This ruling has important consequences for various businesses:
Indian subsidiaries providing services to foreign group companies free of charge must now consider GST exposure. Businesses should evaluate their cross-border service arrangements to ensure proper GST compliance.
Companies that operate under a hub-and-spoke model (such as DHL) must review their operations to ensure they are correctly accounting for GST, even when no foreign exchange is involved.
Even if services are provided on a cost-recovery basis (i.e., not billed), GST may still apply unless foreign exchange is received or an RBI-approved INR settlement is in place.
Businesses with overseas operations should understand how NRIs can avoid double taxation to optimize their tax position when structuring cross-border service arrangements.
The ruling affects businesses seeking GST refunds on services treated as exports when no foreign exchange was received. The issue now shifts from export eligibility to the valuation and treatment of non-payment supplies for GST purposes.
Companies will need to revisit their refund claims and GST treatment for such services.
To avoid GST issues, businesses should follow this checklist:
Engaging an experienced chartered accountant in Bangalore can help businesses avoid valuation errors and GST disputes.
The Delhi High Court’s decision in the DHL Express case makes it clear that GST is due on services provided free of charge, even if they qualify as exports in other respects. The key takeaway is that GST applies when a supply exists, not just when export benefits are available. Businesses must carefully assess their service arrangements, ensure compliance with GST rules, and keep thorough documentation to avoid costly errors. A properly structured Indian entity is the foundation for GST and FEMA compliance.
Get Expert Assistance
Related Articles
LLP Form 11 Filing 2026: Due Date, Fees & Compliance Guide
FEMA & MCA Compliance for Startup Expansion India
Karnataka Minimum Wages 2026–27: Salary & Compliance Guide
Annual ROC Compliance 2025 for MSMEs | Avoid ₹10L Penalty
Top 10 FEMA Mistakes Startups Must Avoid in India 2025Contact Us
Useful Links
©2026 CHHOTA CFO - All rights reserved